<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connectors Create an Experience Everyone Enjoys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnmaxwellonleadership.com/2009/10/26/connectors-create-an-experience-everyone-enjoys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnmaxwellonleadership.com/2009/10/26/connectors-create-an-experience-everyone-enjoys/</link>
	<description>Everything rises and falls on leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:03:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet George</title>
		<link>http://johnmaxwellonleadership.com/2009/10/26/connectors-create-an-experience-everyone-enjoys/comment-page-2/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmaxwellonleadership.com/?p=304#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>I was surprised to find myself not agreeing with you early on in the chapter. When I read, &quot; Now think about the communicators you don’t care for, the ones who were unable to connect with you. If I asked you to describe them using only one word, what would it be? I’m willing to bet that the word would be boring.&quot; it was not &quot;boring&quot; that came to mind. I couldn&#039;t put it in one word, but what I was thinking is that the communicators I don&#039;t care for and who I do not allow to connect with me are the ones I do not respect. If your past actions haven&#039;t earned my respect, then nothing you say in a speech will make me connect with you. If I don&#039;t respect you, chances are good that I don&#039;t trust you, and when I don&#039;t trust you, I don&#039;t want to hear anything that comes out of your mouth. (Barak Obama is a good example of someone like that.) No amount of stories or humor will change that. Action speaks much louder than talk. I listen to Mike Huckabee every weekend on TV because he&#039;s earned my respect so I want to hear what he says. He&#039;s proven credible with his actions so I trust him and can allow him to connect with me. But, after giving this further thought, if the speaker were someone I&#039;d never heard of, then I would agree that &quot;boring&quot; would be an apt one word description. I liked Danny L Smith&#039;s comment, &quot;True connectivity has to be grounded in credibility.&quot;

&quot;Cemetery communication&quot; - funny! Like that!

Thanks for the diaper lesson! LOL I&#039;ll probably remember that more than any other words from the chapter!

Loved the &quot;old saying&quot; about &quot;Talk.&quot;

You mentioned saying your name and then asking audience to say theirs. I have to confess, I&#039;ve heard that done so much it&#039;s gotten really old and I kinda roll my eyes when a speaker does that. Without meaning to sound flippant, the flippant remark  &quot;That&#039;s so yesterday&quot; does come to mind.

Loved the story Judy White, The Infusion Group, LLC, wrote. I&#039;ll remember her story along with the diaper one!

Thanks for another great chapter that leaves me thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised to find myself not agreeing with you early on in the chapter. When I read, &#8221; Now think about the communicators you don’t care for, the ones who were unable to connect with you. If I asked you to describe them using only one word, what would it be? I’m willing to bet that the word would be boring.&#8221; it was not &#8220;boring&#8221; that came to mind. I couldn&#8217;t put it in one word, but what I was thinking is that the communicators I don&#8217;t care for and who I do not allow to connect with me are the ones I do not respect. If your past actions haven&#8217;t earned my respect, then nothing you say in a speech will make me connect with you. If I don&#8217;t respect you, chances are good that I don&#8217;t trust you, and when I don&#8217;t trust you, I don&#8217;t want to hear anything that comes out of your mouth. (Barak Obama is a good example of someone like that.) No amount of stories or humor will change that. Action speaks much louder than talk. I listen to Mike Huckabee every weekend on TV because he&#8217;s earned my respect so I want to hear what he says. He&#8217;s proven credible with his actions so I trust him and can allow him to connect with me. But, after giving this further thought, if the speaker were someone I&#8217;d never heard of, then I would agree that &#8220;boring&#8221; would be an apt one word description. I liked Danny L Smith&#8217;s comment, &#8220;True connectivity has to be grounded in credibility.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Cemetery communication&#8221; &#8211; funny! Like that!</p>
<p>Thanks for the diaper lesson! LOL I&#8217;ll probably remember that more than any other words from the chapter!</p>
<p>Loved the &#8220;old saying&#8221; about &#8220;Talk.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mentioned saying your name and then asking audience to say theirs. I have to confess, I&#8217;ve heard that done so much it&#8217;s gotten really old and I kinda roll my eyes when a speaker does that. Without meaning to sound flippant, the flippant remark  &#8220;That&#8217;s so yesterday&#8221; does come to mind.</p>
<p>Loved the story Judy White, The Infusion Group, LLC, wrote. I&#8217;ll remember her story along with the diaper one!</p>
<p>Thanks for another great chapter that leaves me thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

